Monday, July 31, 2006

Hair for Hope 2006 again


Went down to Suntec with my NS room mate who registered.

And since they allow walk-in volunteers, so i parted hairs. hee hee

Seriously, i really look like a monk.

Watched 龙虎门 with my friend after the shave. Simple storyline with lots of computer effects. Think one or two of the scences was inspired from The Matrix. Overall, its an entertaining show for a lazy Sunday, especially if you grew up with HongKong martial arts comics. ha ha

It is only with this NS friend of mine that i would get the chance to be the deviant that i am. Somehow, we just enjoy the same weird things. ha ha ha

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Saving Some People with Money

An Article from The Guardian 20-7-06

[Wealth and Experience

Bill Gates is the world's richest man, pledged to tackle poverty and disease in the planet's poorest continent. But what happens when the awkward billionaire faces the sick and poor of the townships - and the brighter warmth of Bill Clinton's mission? Sarah Boseley reports

Thursday July 20, 2006
The Guardian

The Thingathinga family live in a corrugated iron shack with no sanitation among thousands of other brightly painted corrugated iron shacks on the outskirts of Cape Town. Ten people, five of them children, share three dark rooms and nobody earns any money. They are among the poorest people on the planet. Last week, the richest man in the world walked in through their door.

Bill and Melinda Gates, with an air of slight embarrassment, sat on a low wooden bench in the middle of the dark room, surreally reminiscent of nervous interviewees on a breakfast TV sofa. Before their arrival, Nkosepaca, the 60-year-old head of the family, had hauled himself across the floor and into a makeshift wheelchair at one end of the bench. He lost both legs above the knee when he fell off a crowded train a couple of years ago, and the stumps were tied up with filthy rags. Gates, whose personal wealth exceeds $40bn (£22bn), sat next to him, hands in his lap, eyes lowered below his baseball cap and feet wedged behind one of the chair's wheels, which might once have belonged to a bicycle.

How were they to make conversation? Bill and Melinda Gates, whose charitable foundation takes as its premise that all lives have equal value, struggled to connect. They were there to talk about tuberculosis, because the foundation is putting millions into research to replace the ancient and inadequate BCG vaccine and find new drugs to shorten the six-month treatment time. Nkosepaca has had TB four times, infected by different strains of the bacterium - something which it later appeared had fascinated Bill Gates, who was to raise it with scientists again and again, asking what the implications were for a vaccine.

But faced with the man, he was silent and it was his wife Melinda who tried politely to engage Nkosepaca about his health, and who lit up with real warmth as she caught the eye of a wild-haired, fidgety granddaughter or a big-eyed baby. When his turn came to ask a question, Gates, looking less than comfortable, resorted to numbers.

"How many people live here?" he asked in that staccato voice that carries all the feeling of a computer chip, followed by: "How long have you had electricity?" (The answer was six years.)

The Gateses were on their first tour in South Africa since Bill announced he would step aside from Microsoft (although only reducing his involvement, he says) in 2008 and the billionaire financier Warren Buffet announced he would give the $30bn foundation most of his fortune - effectively doubling it in size.

The family had no idea of the vast wealth at Gates's disposal. "Do you know who he is?" I asked them. They shook their heads. "Or why he has come?" No clue. But as most destitute Africans reasonably do, faced with a white, well-fed foreigner, Nkosepaca asked him for help. "He asks if anybody can help us because the money we're getting is too little to sustain a family," translated a young man from the Desmond Tutu TB Centre at Stellenbosch University, which had arranged the visit. Later, one of the daughters spoke up. "I just want to know whether you can help our father," said 25-year-old Kutala quietly in English from the back of the room.

"We came for a visit," answered Melinda. "We certainly will do something to help your family because you have been so hospitable today."

If they chose, they could propel this family and many like them into prosperity with a nod. They could buy them food, a new house, clothes, education for the children and never notice a difference in the bank balance. It's an instinctual reaction, they say, but it's not the right one. Gates calls it "a kind of a retail approach where you say, 'OK, just the people I've seen - I'll help them.' It's like saying, 'OK, the ones I haven't seen don't matter - just the ones I've seen matter.'"

"We do a special gift for the houses that we go into, but that's more out of courtesy. It isn't how you can change the basic phenomenon that we've got here."

Melinda agrees, but with an emotional underlay. "I don't think you ever go into a place like this and leave without thinking about the individual. I've gone into some of the orphanages where you'd like to take all the children home with you. But then you have to always try and upscale from there and say, 'OK, if I help just that one child, what am I doing for the entire cause?'"

Gates has the ability to ring-fence a problem and focus his formidable mental energies on solving it. He moves it into a detached dimension, where he can be scientifically rational. Emotion does not get in the way. Confronted with the poverty and suffering of individuals, most people do not feel like that. In the little shack, as the Gateses run out of questions, Nulda Beyers, the professor at the Desmond Tutu TB Centre who has arranged the visit to the township of Khayelitsha, begins to prompt Nkosepaca. There are things that matter to her and that she clearly thinks Bill and Melinda ought to know. In the room are three young women with four small children between them. "Where are all the men?" she asks the old man.

"All the boys are on the street. They won't support their kids," he answers.

She pushes it further, with real feeling in her voice. "It's a big problem. The men run away. What advice can you give us for your daughters and their children? How can we make the men more responsible?"

"The men must support their kids. They are a gift from God," comes the answer.

Gates has not been following. "Where are the men? Are they gone?" he asks. The question relates to the messy world outside the clinical parameters of the development of vaccines and drugs for TB. But Melinda is there. "They won't come here because they have to face up to the fact they have to support the family?"

Of course, the Gateses know the social and economic realities of life in townships. Gates recalls his visit to Soweto, where he took a computer and then realised that the failure of electricity to power it was not the most urgent issue in people's lives. The pressing problems beyond the scientific challenges of new medicines have led the couple to set up a global development programme, but he does not have a clear vision of where it is going.

"In health, there are incredible solutions like vaccinations where, with an upfront investment, you can dramatically change a disease. In some of these other issues about jobs, motivation, education, it's not as clear what the dramatic impact is in those areas, but certainly we're thinking about it," he says. Clean water and improving crops - "so many people talk about being hungry" - are two of the items on the agenda.

He prefers philanthropy performed with technical discipline; altruism run like a multi-billion-dollar business. It will probably get results - perhaps spectacular results - but Gates is never going to be a crowd-pleaser.

Two days later, the relatively modest Gates entourage is swallowed by a whale. Bill and Melinda's fact-finding trip links up with Bill Clinton's Africa tour. Clinton is doing five countries in seven days. It's Wednesday, so it must be Lesotho - the tiny state within a state whose tribe held out in the mountains when the British took the rest of South Africa. It is proud and it is dirt-poor and suddenly there are three huge private jets on the Maseru airstrip - probably more planes than have ever been there at one time before.

Ex-presidential philanthropy looks different from that of software billionaires. Gates has his own private plane, naturally, but Clinton has two bigger ones, loaned by people richer than himself. And his millionaire backers come along for the ride, bewitched by the Clinton charisma but with nobody much to talk to. The small man with prematurely white hair and dark glasses is Frank Giustra, the Canadian financier and head of Lion's Gate Entertainment. The big man in the vibrantly striped shirt is Karl Heinz Körgel, a German media mogul - though his pilot needs some sleep, so the 15 or more journalists and camera crews following Clinton, together with a more modest four writers accompanying Gates, are temporarily on a plane leased from the president of Djibouti. It has a double bed at the back and sofas with seat belts that are mostly ignored and as we take off, Ira Magaziner, who runs the global health side of the Clinton Foundation, is perched on the side of an armchair. We sit on the table or floor to hear his briefing and catch cans of cold Coke before they slide away. There is something of a party atmosphere.

The good humour lingers on as an extraordinary cavalcade of 10 or more white cars with tinted windows and police escort screeches across a parched landscape of failed maize crops and dry grass, with hardly more than a few handfuls of bemused local farmers to notice. Lesotho has one of the highest rates of HIV infection in the world, at somewhere between 23% and 31% of young adults. We are headed for an Aids clinic which, with Clinton Foundation backing, is now offering drug treatment not just to adults but also to children. Few disagree that Clinton already has made a significant difference to Aids treatment, using his name and standing and the expertise he can command to force down the price of drugs.

And suddenly there is the former US president, in the middle of a crowded courtyard at Mafeteng hospital. Clinton has emerged from a private meeting with a small girl twisting and spinning from his hands. Arriet, six, is the first child to receive antiretroviral drugs here. She has been on them for eight months, is clearly very well and Clinton knows exactly how to handle her. She does not want to talk but gets interested in my camera, so I let her look through the viewfinder and then take her picture, while Clinton bends down to get in the shot. I show it to her and she laughs and laughs.

It is very well done. Even his security guards, the bristling, dark-suited heavies with earpieces who talk into their sleeves, melt away around the former president so you are left as if alone with him. Clinton is relaxed and warm. He lingers; he has time for everyone. He seems to have a genuine liking for people. He gives a speech of thanks at the clinic and all around people are loving him, while Bill and Melinda stand alongside, fading into the background.

You believe that Clinton cares. The focus on the human, on the individual, the stories about the brother and sister in the Bahamas for whom he got Aids drugs and whom he visits every year tell you that. And he banks the adulation and approbation to use as leverage later on.

Gates now shares platforms with world leaders, but you sense he talks numbers with them. So many lives potentially saveable. So many millions for a vaccine. He does not do human and he does not want to do politics. "Politics is a dangerous word," he says. "We're involved in working with governments to talk to them about how rich governments can make their aid money be used more effectively and encourage them to do more aid. We're involved with developing-world governments in terms of trying pilot programmes and, when something works, encouraging them to replicate that. I make a distinction between that and politics."

Some might argue for a moral imperative to get into the political argument in South Africa, where the health minister supports lemon and garlic as a cure for Aids and millions are set to die while the treatment plan is slowly, grudgingly rolled out. Gates says what has been achieved so far is due to the activists and the press. But he is meeting the deputy president privately later that day and is waiting to hear whether he will be talking to President Mbeki in person or on the phone.

"Hopefully we say good things and get them excited about doing more on these issues," he says. "Any ideas we have about the way things can improve, we will share."

"We're not the activists," Melinda goes on. "The press is the press and the activists are the activists. In private we can share whatever thoughts we might have."

Privacy matters. The Gateses will do what they have to do on the public stage to advance Microsoft or the foundation, but beyond that they do not seek attention. Their philanthropy is a family ideal, handed on from their parents. They intend that their own children should understand what it means to be less equal. Their two older children were in South Africa with them, hidden from the press. On the day after the visit to the Thingathinga family, the Gateses took 10-year-old Jennifer and seven-year-old Rory to see the crowded corrugated iron homes of Khayelitsha for themselves. "We talk at the dinner table about these issues. We think as a family we have a responsibility to give back to the world," says Melinda. If the children want to participate in the foundation, well and good, she says, but "I hope that when they grow up they will follow their own passion. They need to lead their own lives."

She talks about feeling great "as a mom" when she sees tiny babies whose lives are safer for the vaccines the foundation has funded. Gates compares the human body to a computer system. "The human body is the most interesting system," he says. "It is the most complex system." He has been reading books on the immune system since he was 32, adds Melinda, with the faintest whisper of humour. While the best job he could have in the world is the one he has, says Gates, the second best would be discovering new medicines. "It is a field that is changing. You get new tools all the time. You can have a huge impact. The kind of work and thinking that goes on is very like software," he says.

He is excited, energised, by the ideas of brilliant scientists who must think him a 21st-century messiah. Who else is going to fund their money-losing, world-saving ideas? Gates says what would be unthinkable at Microsoft. "We can afford to have a lot of failures. We're going to have a lot of failures. I will not stop working on malaria, TB or Aids because of failures."

The Buffet money means that he can gamble more millions than he expected. Extraordinarily, he is capable of counting the pennies one moment and throwing vast sums at unpredictable prospects the next. He asks prices, wants to know whether they take credit or just cash behind the wire netting in the Khayelitsha shops. But on arguably the hardest scientific challenge in medicine today, which could easily cost him billions, he says: "We're not going to give up working on an Aids vaccine. Not in my lifetime." And when I ask if he could reach a point when he will decide that too much money has been spent with nothing to show for it, he answers with what passes for a laugh: "Ask me in 30 years' time."

Regardless of anyone's views on Microsoft's business practices, it is an attitude that has to command respect. As he says himself, no government facing election every four years would take such risks. He is not standing in for rich governments - he is doing what they do not dare to do. If this is what philanthropy is about in our times, perhaps we should just be glad. ]

The End

Afterthoughts

Went to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation website to check out the organization’s visions and stuff. What the foundation is trying to do is of course commendable. At the moment, over 10 billions dollars have been given for purposes approved

We all heard the old saying that “Money isn't everything”. In this instance, having the largest fund possible in the world or having almost unlimited cash still isn't enough to solve any problems or bring about immediate or foreseeable relieves to those that matter. All things take time, especially social, environmental and political problems.

Gates's method of using money to solve the world's problem is a practical one but it lacks the human touch. Managing expectations should also be essential part in any of their endeavors. Humans being humans, are a greedy and impatient lot who demands immediate self-gratification and ignore suffering of others.

In the long run, curing all disease like cancer, AIDS or even flu is an admirable endeavor but more humans are wiped off through war than any other major disease outbreak. Will eliminating all disease / illness help to make the world a better place by having people live longer naturally? Not if they are suffering from the ravages of war or living under oppressive regimes or corrupted administration. Probably the only people that will reap the benefits are those that are already comfortably living in their air-conditioned cocoons.

Does building more schools or generally improve education levels help to make the world a better place? Probably only the people in first world country would benefit from the cheap labour but educated work force that comes about. What about the university graduates who, in the end, still need to export themselves to foreign lands as maids, construction workers to earn a decent living?

So. Is what the Gates trying to achieve an exercise in futility? Of course not. It brings relieves to people who need it, even if these needy people are more accessible and visible. Helping everyone in the world is impossible even if you have unlimited resources because there are many uncontrollable factors involved.

As long the Gates stay to their guide lines in doing their charity work in their little cocoon and dun try to solve poverty problem of those living in the poorest countries in the world, I guess what they are doing is fine.

The day may come where one has to make a political stand on some of the poor goverance still exisiting around the world, then, then what will this foundation do ?

Monday, July 24, 2006

He's The Murderer
























He's The Murderer by PhilliPah (DeviantArt)

Friday, July 21, 2006

Bush Veto Stem Cell Bill

"On this 20th, President George W Bush exercised this veto rights to the legislation to increase the funding of research using human embryo cells to fight serious illnesses, stoking a fraught emotional and ethical debate.

Supporters of the Bill say it would allow research only on cells created in fertility clinics which would otherwise be thrown away, but President Bush claims the legislation would have supported the use of human beings as scientific material.

Is it acceptable to use embryo cells to seek a cure for devastating illnesses such as Alzheimer's, or is such research a violation of human life? " - from The Telegraph.Co.UK.


6 interesting comments on the Telegraph website :

1

Stem cells are the building bricks of our bodies - able to be whatever kind of tissue we need - and without the rejection issues other forms of organ replacement lead to with recipients. This research has the ultimate potential of making it possible to cure any illness, repair or replace any worn out body parts - in short enable someone to live forever. Science fiction? No a reasonable extrapolation of what we know so far about stem cells from research. So we have the technology on the way - the other side of the equation is obvious - who will have the cash? Stem cells may achieve wonderful things but are they for all - or will the full power of what they may prove able to do be reserved only for the super-rich? Private health care has always been able to offer a bit more than the limits of state health care systems - that is why it thrives even today in Britain with the most expensive NHS model in the world. If we are to pursue stem cell research we need to determine where it is going and whether it is to be for mass cures available to all - or amazing feats of bio-engineering for the few - and if by that we mean the few who can pay.Posted by simon coulter on July 20, 2006 3:31 PM

2

All of the medical advances in stem cells have been in adult stem cells, why do people want to continue dead end research in embryonic stem cell research? Posted by Richard T. Ketchum on July 20, 2006

3

President Bush did the right thing and should use his veto power more often to put a stop to unnecessary spending. Most of the negative comments (see Vivian Philips's remarks as an example) miss the real issue: spending tax money to support controversial research is neither acceptable to many taxpayers nor is it necessary. Most funding for disease and prevention research comes from the private sector, and already millions have been raised to fund stem cell research and many universities, including Harvard, with its enormous endowment, have established privately funded stem cell research centers. Government should spend its money on public works, education and defence and not in places where private money can and will do a better job, as the history of failed government projects has proved.Posted by jay williams, jr. on July 20, 2006 2:24 PM

4

To imply that anyone who is opposed to embryonic stem cell research is some kind of religious lunatic is deeply insulting. I am not of any religious persuasion, but I strongly believe that all human life, whether it be a few dozen cells or a couple of trillion, is sacred and deserves to be protected from deliberate harm. It is no more morally acceptable to carry out research on these "unwanted" embryos than on "unwanted" children in orphanages. We must learn the difference between right and wrong, and if scientists cannot be trusted to keep within moral boundaries then politicians must make them do so. The diseases which this research may alleviate are indeed terrible, but the taking of human lives to extend others is simply not acceptable. Posted by Alison Rawlinson on July 20, 2006 2:16 PM

5

Stemcells are a bit of a generic headline grabbing statement. What are stem cells? They reside in the retina of a chick even as much as in the bone marrow. Each of these stem cells requires 'trophines' and 'growth factors' to differentiate. The question is at which dose and under which culture conditions? Since nobodies knows bioscientists take embryonal stem cells,which they think are the primorial cells of all stem cells. But at the moment nobody succeeded other than in scientific fraud experiments to implement the theory, as cell culture conditions cannot mimmic the real organism as yet. These guys find themselves in the brutal middle-ages of cell culture and they should firstly accomplish their ideas in an animal model before doing it in a human. So far nothing has been delivered by these stem cell scientists but hot air. It will take years until they can deliver a product Posted by christian a. hehn on July 20, 2006 1:38 PM

6
What modern science has taught us about embryos: they're nothing particularly special. Every cell has some potential to become a full individual, via cloning or other similar processes. If an embryo is a sacred life then so is every other cell - and that would just be silly. So, really, I can't see a valid objection to using what is basically a barely differentiated blob of cells for medical research. It's not "a person" yet and in the case of IVF spares, it never will be.Posted by Julian Morrison on July 20, 2006 12:28 PM

Afterthoughts

As an atheist, I just really can’t comprehend the vetoing of stem cell research with Bush citing Christian Rights and stuffs.

All major medical advances started out with the same opposition by moralist and conservative people, i.e blood-transfusions, abortions, surgery, IVF treatments.

But with time, education and compassion for people who are really suffering, I’m sure we will be laughing about this in many years to come.

No doubt, one can’t say if it really can bring the much-touted benefits or God, if there’s one, will be cursing the scientists who started this idea, but the advancement for medical science must start somewhere.

Hair for Hope 2006

Children’s Cancer Foundation (CCF) accepted my friend, Ong Su Kit, this morning but I couldn’t join as the slots are full by the time I called. What a pity. I’m quite sure that I can get a decent donation. Oh well.

Subscribed to their newsletter, so I’m sure to make it for next year. Yeah!

Our children are our future. Kindly pledge to my friend or donate in other ways at www.ccf.org.sg/hfh/

Maybe I can register as a bone marrow donor....

Thursday, July 20, 2006

我也爱台妹 !!!

The original MV of MC Hotdog’s 我爱台妹 can be viewed at YouTube.

But I’m going to post the 台湾金曲奖2006 version found here, coz its more symbolic and I like it. Yeah !

Buying Luck

Starting hearing Radio DJs discussing about this issue to remind me that a Public Holiday is around the corner. Its on a Wednesday.

Actually, I dun see what’s wrong with selling free National Day Tickets. Just the economics of Supply and Demand in action.

Un-nationalistic? It is just helping people who really want to watch the whole celebration much much more but who dun have the seller’s luck to get the tickets. These people just want to watch it, even at a premium. With the money that the tickets bring, it will be used to boost the economy. Why would this be unpatriotic?

On this note, while I can support National Day Concept but the actual National Day celebration is out for me due to the trauma from my NS days. Which is also why I will never watch it or be involved in anyway.

Sadly though… it is also why I dun get to make any money this way.

Wasted.

Hmm... but selling the tickets isn't a crime in the first place, right ?

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

The Black Book

Wrote something on the manga Death Note and its movie adaptations at my msn blog.

Personally i like the wallpaper with the floating apple. Cool.

Saturday, July 15, 2006

The Colour of Political Censorship - the last say.

Apparently Lee Boon Yang had the last say, so far, on this matter before our mainstream media relegate this item to Limbo Land.

Reproduced from AsiaOne.

July 12, 2006

Why Government has to respond to mr brown's comments

AsiaOne
-->
Well-known local blogger "mr brown" was taken to task today by a second minister for his criticism on key government policies in his column in the Today newspaper, which dropped him last Friday.

Dismissing the various allegations which the 36-year-old Singaporean full-time writer had made in his weekly column as unfair and unjustified, Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts Lee Boon Yang said the Government was duty-bound to respond to such "distortions", which would undermine confidence in the Government, if allowed to spread.

In his last column published in Today on June 30, mr brown, whose real name is Lee Kin Mun, commented that the increases in taxi fare and electricity tariffs had come right after the General Election, at a time when a Government survey showed a growing income gap.

That invited a robust reply from the Government. In a letter published in Today on July 3, Ms K Bhavani, Press Secretary to the Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts (Mica), said his views "distort the truth" and offered no solutions. "It is not the role of journalists or newspapers in Singapore to champion issues, or campaign for or against the Government," she added.

The editors of Today suspended "mr brown" column last Friday.

Responding to media queries on the suspension the following day, Second Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts Vivian Balakrishnan said the mainstream media had a responsibility to ensure a certain standard of discussion in national debates, as it was not the same as an Internet chatroom.

Dr Lee reinforced the Government's position when asked by reporters this morning to comment on the suspension of mr brown's column after he launched the Singapore HeritageFest at Suntec City. (For his speech on the Singaporean identity, click here.)

"I think he made very unfair, unjustified comments on key government policies, and various allegations which are unfounded, of course, all under the guise of humour," said the minister on why the Government had to set the record straight.

"I think we are duty-bound to give a response to mr brown, to address his comments, and we did. We sent our response. We were just exercising our right of reply."

He warned that if such distortions were allowed to spread, it would undermine confidence in the government, and would make it more difficult to rally Singaporeans for national objectives.

Dr Lee said the mainstream media must be be objective, accurate and responsible for its views.

"And that's always been my position, or the position of this Government - that the mainstream newspaper must report accurately, objectively and responsibly," he said. "And that they must adopt this model that they are part of this nation-building effort, rather than go out and purvey views that would mislead people, confuse people, which will in fact undermine our national strategy!"

He added that as the Internet was often a free-for-all arena, certain critical and humourous elements were acceptable. It was not the Government's intention to chase after every posting on the Internet, said the minister.

Asked if the Government's actions contradicted his earlier statement about taking a lighter touch with bloggers, Dr Lee told reporters: "I said that we will look at how we can have a lighter touch in regulating the internet during the election. Mr brown's comments was not posted on his blog. If he had posted the same comment on his blog, we will treat it as part of the internet chatter, and we would have just let it be. But he didn't post it - he wrote it and published it in the mainstream newspaper. That's the difference."

Meanwhile, the police are looking into a gathering of 30 people who turned up wearing brown to support the blogger at city Hall MRT station on Sunday afternoon, in response to an SMS message that had circulated over the weekend after the suspension of mr brown's weekly column in Today, which sparked online postings by bloggers and netizens, mostly criticical of Today's move. (For ST report, click here.)

Related stories:

S'porean blogger Mr Brown's column suspended by Today free newspaper

Today paper suspends blogger's columnVivian stresses media's role in ensuring standard of national debates

Cops looking into gathering in support of mr brown

What makes you, You? (Dr Lee Boon Yang's speech)

Friday, July 14, 2006

The Head Butt Issue

Quite sick of hearing people discussing about this issue.

Insulting the family of other players is obviously wrong. But Zidane is still guilty of the Red Card even if Materazzi did insult his mother and sister then.

While most people argued in favour of Zidane and give him a wide berth due the nature of the remarks, saying that he places more importance on his family than on the game or he is just being agitated/stressed during the game, it is sad that they do not recognise their fallacy.

Zidane is a professional soccer player but should have known better then to use violence to express his feelings on the field, which totally degrades the Beautiful Game and hence his apologies on the news. As such he is unworthy of the Golden Ball title. It would have been a different story if he head butted Materazzi after they had left the field...

His thuggish action is on the same level as a policeman abusing his power on some one that insulted his family. There is no excuse.

You might argue that professional footballers do not need to subscribe to such high moral standards. My counter-arguement would be that this is what separates a good soccer player from a legendary one.

Too bad...

Thursday, July 13, 2006

There is an answer !

Apparently, there is a logical conclusion to the age old question of "Chicken or Egg?".

The discussion can be found on Wikipedia and is convincingly deduced by CNN.

Hmm... Guess the news escaped my notice....

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

The Colour of Political Censorship

Last Thursday, Mr Brown announced that he was dropped from Today, while Mr Miyagi will still continue his weekly column. This news warranted space on website of Reporters Without Borders (RSF). Locally, mainly non-traditional media, aka blogs, give this news some acknowledgement (Tomorrow, Mr. Brown etc).

On the 9th, a flash mob was organised to protest against the development of this issue and was reported on Singapore Guardian Unlimited). Unexpectedly, ST's Stomp featured a short article about the flash mob with a photo of the Brown Shirt. Probably allowed as Stomp is considered non-mainstream by the Gov't.
















The latest development is that even Mr. Miyagi has quitted Today on the 10th. The reason being self-evident to the local blogging community.

But is this end of the issue or the start of a crack/s in the iron glove of the current adminstration?

Will the local enforcement haul up those involved in the flash mob, thereby leading to a public outcry ? (Hopefully the Gov't is not that suicidal)

Who will be the next blogger/person to get "reprimanded" when airing his views non-partisanly?

Will the younger voters be put off by this or future occurences and thus leading to an interesting Election next time round?

Whatever the case maybe, i will end with this analogy that i came up with today :

A bird in a cage will not be happy even if its given enough food and comforts and even more female birds.

Monday, July 10, 2006

Seeking

When there's a motive for search, the end of the search is already known.

Being unhappy, you seek happiness;therefore you have ceased to seek, for you think you already know what happiness is.

- Jiddu Krishnamurti

Flying the Green, White & Red.

World Cup 2006 Finals.

It’s Italy. Now 4 times Champion. (Brazil got it 5 times).

The first half was dominated by Italy but the France overtook the ball in the 2nd half. WTF were the Italians doing? Apparently they had decided to go for the 稳扎稳打 strategy (aka Kiasi) which focused on defense while the French men went mad on the field, especially Zinedine Zidane who got sent off with a red card using his 铁头功 on Marco Materazzi (23) during the extra time.

Oh well… finally it ends.

Btw, 2010 World Cup will be held in South Africa. Imagine that.

Will any of the South African teams make it into the quarter finals or more ?

We can only wait and see.

Sunday, July 09, 2006

百年好和

Saturday

Attended the wedding of our dear Cpt Tan and his wife XZ at a Habourfront Restaurant.

The food from Dragon Gate turns out alright despite what former patrons remembered. The restaurant was able to accommodate 79 tables just rightly.

It is amazing that they have lasted 12 years 6 months and 6 days, if I remember the flash correctly, considering the current trend in relationships.

My blessing to this newly-weds,百年好和。

Thereafter, my gang went to Chinatown 茶人之家 for some singing along till 3+am before sending the west-siders back to their abode for their beauty sleep.

Watched the Germany vs Portugal match (3-1) before I KO-ed at 5am… Think I missed the first goal by Germany. Not that it matters that much. Good effort by Germany. Portugal still need more experience before they can meet the big boys in 2010.

On a final note… who’s hosting the next World Cup ?

Saturday, July 08, 2006

The Silence that we ignored.

Britain falls silent for the London bombings for 2 minutes on Friday.

In case you forgot :

“Fifty-two people died when four British Muslim suicide bombers, with explosives packed into rucksacks, blew themselves up inside three packed London underground trains and a double-decker bus on July 7, 2005.

It was the worst-ever terrorist attack on British soil, as well as Europe's first experience with a suicide bombing. “ Quote – CNA.

My sympathy goes out to the victims and their family, of course.

But on the same note. Do you remember any other terrorist attack, besides the obvious 911 incident ? Did anyone bothered to keep silence for the 2002 Bali attack, or the one in Madrid 2005, or those in less developed countries where there were much more victims ?

Check out Wikipedia’s List of Terrorist Incidents. Not trying to be cynical here but maybe you would have to keep silence for most part of your life after reading it.

Friday, July 07, 2006

Singapore needs to loosen up, technologically. - CNA

Singapore may be keen to develop computer games and animated movies on its shores but frankly, the country is too tame for the typical digital media worker ?this according to a man who should know.

Its strait-laced image could stand in the way of the Republic becoming an interactive and digital
media hub, said Mr Peter Schwartz (picture), co-founder and chairman of the Global Business Network.

"The game development culture is a culture that is rather loose and wild, and Hollywood is the same," said Mr Schwartz, who was in town as a member of the Research, Innovation and Enterprise Council to discuss research and development proposals in strategic areas identified by Singapore.

He added: "If you are going to be in the business of developing entertainment media, you are going to have to deal with a fairly scruffy type of person. Singapore is not too good at dealing with scruffy people; you don't like people like that much around here.

"One of the challenges is: Are you going to be sufficiently tolerant of the kinds of creative people in these industries that often emerge in very creative societies?"

Apart from digital media, the National Research Foundation has decided to focus on Environmental and Water Technologies, and Biomedical Sciences.

Scientists may like Singapore, but it will be harder to get along with digital media workers, said Mr Schwartz, an aeronautical engineer and futurist who has worked on thrillers like Minority Report and Deep Impact. Some, he said, "have hair down to here and smell of pot".

So if the Singapore Government wants digital media to take off here, tolerance levels for this breed will have to change.

"I think technically Singapore is very well suited, socially it's very well suited," he said.

"All the things are right, but in this one dimension it has to be more tolerant. It's one thing if you are a great scientist to come here ?this is one of the best places to do science. It may not be one of the best places in the world to design very creative games ...

"That's going to be the biggest problem. It's not technology, it's not money, it's not opportunities, it's whether you can attract or retain the creative types who will create the great movies, the great games, the great television shows."

Once that is overcome, opportunities in digital media are boundless as the world moves from the generation that leans backwards (to watch TV) to the generation that leans forward (toward the computer screen).

Other than digital media, Mr Schwartz thinks that Singapore has a good chance to take on the global water industry. However, there is a need to come up with a viable business proposal.
"Will you just sell technology? Will you license interesting technology to the world? Or will you own and operate water and desalination plants all over the world?" he asked.

Noting that the need for clean fresh water around the world will only grow exponentially, Mr Schwartz said that the fieldis technologically ripe for Singapore to take advantage of, particularly as it scarcely poses any political threat.

"If you're think about it, we're paying more for water than gasoline," he said. "A bottle of Perrier costs more the equivalent in gasoline; it's pretty good business."

Of course, factors such as climate change could derail the best-laid R&D plans, he said.

"Imagine that Singapore gets hit with a typhoon 50 per cent bigger than Katrina. When the sea level is already a foot high, you are going to be building dykes around Singapore ... just like the Dutch," he said.

Mr Schwartz, a venture capitalist, also encouraged Singapore to overcome its obsession with success.

"It only wants to bet on winners," he said. "Well you can't because you don't know ... and if your range of risk is narrow, your range of success will also be narrow." - /sh, Courtesy of CNA.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I always thought Consultants are full of bullshit, now I have a better view of them. Have to agree with the interviewee here, especially on the last paragraph. But will this gov’t listen ? yeah right.

So anyone thinking of getting into the multi-media industry, the advice is to “Get out of Singapore to find your limitless sky” and come back only as a foreign import to earn big bucks as a media consultant citing “foreign experience”, that is if you can still stand this stifling env’t.

The only thing that I’m puzzled about is the paragraph on “a typhoon 50 per cent bigger than Katrina ”. Not so sure about this leh. Always thought we are well-covered by our neighbors. But then, what do I know when I am not a typhoon expert.

:/

人生如梦... 吃个香蕉.

Thursday.

Met up with a big gang of uni school mates at Suntec. Good to see everyone still well. There were weiL, xiangX, KS, Lips, Lifen, dan, cam, bob. Faj & Hon were doing OT, Ter fell asleep after returning from reservist training.

After the dinner gang dispersed, citing the need to rest like old man and old woman that they have become, Dan and I moved to MOS to finish up our bottle of Martel which expired on Monday. We were joined by Hon and Ter subsequently. The funny thing was that none of us remember what drink it was that we had kept at MOS. Some thought it was vodka, some thought it was Jim Beam, I thought it was Chivas Regal.

Later we moved on to Thumpers where Rain was absent, to the disappointment of those that suggested the place. It was quite good, based on my first impression there.

It was a long time since I partied that hard, which seems like a year ago, and I was really enjoying the 2nd hand smoke, crowded dance floor, deafening music and etc etc.

Then came Murphy’s Law which was and is always a bitch to me.

Received a call from my boss informing me that a colleague from my current work place had died after going through routine medical testing/checkup at NUH.

. . . . . silence. . .

He was only 48. It was totally unexpected. Not his wife. Not his 4 kids. And not his colleagues, who were waiting for him to return to work next week after his check up. His family suspected negligence and is now waiting for the police investigation report.

For some one that had only known him for less then a year, I find this whole episode an enlightening, albeit a sad one.

Life to me is mostly unpredictable, otherwise I would have won 4D or Toto whenever I buy, even if rarely. I wouldn’t say bored you with the usually motivational messages like :

“Seize the day”, “ Work hard, Play Hard”, “Just do it” etc etc.

So I propose “人生如梦, 吃个香蕉” which will be my personal mantra from now onwards. My life is like eating a banana. Why ar? No one else will understand lah coz its personal to me. You have to search for your own personal mantra. You have to experience it and not copy from others so that it would be a heartfelt one before you can understand life is like eating a banana.

On another related matter. Is the quality of our healthcare getting from bad to worst? There seems to be more cases of malpractice news coming out. Or is our healthcare professionals are really stressed out and understaffed as reported recently? Is the talent drain from public sector to the more lucrative private sector that much more extensive than previously reported? Or is it that patients are more aware of your rights and are distrustful of their doctors?

So much questions… which minister can answer ? ha ha

Anyway, 人生如梦... 吃个香蕉。

Monday, July 03, 2006

My Tax Dollars ... Wasted at MICA.

Tomorrow.sg featured a stupid reply from MICA regarding an article published last friday by the infamous blogger Mr. Brown for TODAY . Click on the links to read about it.

As a reply from the Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts, one really can't see the communication element, the information element and lastly the artistic element in handling adverse public opinion. So much for progress...

A lot of comments have been made at Tomorrow and at Mr. Brown's Website already but there are 2 that i have to reiterate to express my strong discontent on this issue.

First.

Quote from MICA's letter : "As for means testing for special school fees, we understand mr brown's disappointment as the father of an autistic child. However, with means testing, we can devote more resources to families who need more help."

Although read in context with the whole paragraph, one cannot really construe the underlined sentence as a veiled personal attack. But as an authority, they should have better sense than to use sensitive words as such. Makes one wonder if anyone from the MICA vetted Ms. K Bhavani's letter before sending for publication. Of course it is likely the top echelon really did approve of the reply... hmm...

Second.

One can safely assume that Today received numerous replys and feedbacks on this issue... But there was no mention at all in any of the morning papers till date. Self-censorship or the invisible hand ? Someone behind the invisible hand couldn't possibly have thought that by whitewashing this issue, ordinary people would develop amnesia ??

Seriously???